Title of Site

Site Name

Main Content

California Upholds Statewide Plastic Bag Ban

November 10, 2016

Authors

Bryan Cave and Merrit Jones

California Upholds Statewide Plastic Bag Ban

November 10, 2016

by: Bryan Cave and Merrit Jones

Californians narrowly validated the statewide plastic bag ban previously passed by the state Legislature, while rejecting a proposition that would have required retailers to remit money charged for single-use carry-out bags to an environmental fund.

Proposition 67 was approved by 52 percent of voters. It continues the statewide ban prohibiting grocery stores and other selected retailers from handing out single-use plastic bags, but allows them to sell recycled paper bags and reusable bags for a minimum of 10 cents.

The state Legislature approved the ban and the governor signed it into law in 2014, but a referendum forced the issue onto the ballot. The law applies to the following retailers:

  • Full-line, self-service retail stores with gross annual sales of at least $2 million that sell dry groceries, canned goods, or nonfood items, and some perishable items.
  • Pharmacies with at least 10,000 square feet of retail space.
  • Convenience stores,
    Read More

Election Day: Time Off to Vote Requirements

November 4, 2016

Authors

Bryan Cave, Sarah Bloom and Jay Warren

Election Day: Time Off to Vote Requirements

November 4, 2016

by: Bryan Cave, Sarah Bloom and Jay Warren

Election Day is less than a week away and employees may have begun already requesting time off to go to the polls. The law varies state-by-state for when employers must honor these requests and grant employees voting leave. It is important to know the laws in your state, as certain states can subject the employer to civil or even criminal liability for failing to comply.

Please click here to view a summary of employers’ obligations to provide employees with time off to vote in the following eight states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Missouri, New York, and Texas. Each of these states has a law that governs which employees must be given time off, whether advance notice is required, and whether this time must be paid. This list is non-exhaustive and focuses on states where our firm has offices.

Florida, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington DC do

Read More

What to Look for When Buying Cyber Insurance

October 27, 2016

Authors

Bryan Cave and David Zetoony

What to Look for When Buying Cyber Insurance

October 27, 2016

by: Bryan Cave and David Zetoony

Most retailers know they need insurance to cover risks to their property such as fire or theft, or their risk of liability if someone is injured in the workplace.  As numerous high-profile breaches demonstrate, retailers also need to carry coverage for data breaches.  While many insurance companies offer cyber insurance, not all policies are created equal.

Why is buying cyber insurance difficult?

  • There is little standardization among competing policies; as a result, it is hard to comparison shop.
  • Policies’ exclusions often swallow coverage; as a result, assessing the value of a policy is difficult unless you have extensive experience with the types of liabilities that arise following data breaches.
  • Policies often cover security but not privacy risks.
  • Items to review when shopping for cyber insurance:

  • Do the sub-limits on coverage match the corresponding risks?
  • Does the policy include sub-retentions (sub-deductibles) that are unlikely to be reached?
  • Does exclusion prevent payment for the largest risks, e.g.,charges
    Read More
  • Yelp Cannot Be Held Liable for Negative Review

    October 20, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave and Flora Sarder

    Yelp Cannot Be Held Liable for Negative Review

    October 20, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave and Flora Sarder

    Retailers are familiar with Yelp.com as a ratings website with a star rating system that allows customers to rate products and services they receive, as well as add individual reviews and comments. Positive reviews can generate business for retailers, and negative reviews can be a source of concern.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled, however, that Yelp’s multiple-choice star rating system does not make the review site a publisher or provider of allegedly defamatory content that may be subject to liability. In Kimzey v. Yelp! Inc., the Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of an action by a small business owner seeking to hold Yelp liable for a one-star rating by a third party, and challenging Yelp’s immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.

    Section 230 Immunizes Interactive Service Providers From Liability

    Under Section 230, a provider of an “interactive computer service” is immune from liability

    Read More

    Retailers Seek Perfect Balance Between In-Store, Online and Mobile Customers

    October 13, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave, Carol Osborne and Paula Levitan

    Retailers Seek Perfect Balance Between In-Store, Online and Mobile Customers

    October 13, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave, Carol Osborne and Paula Levitan

    Retailers are increasingly under pressure to evaluate their business models and, in particular, the mix of their in-store, online and mobile offerings. Just as there are few pure-play e-tailers, there are very few retailers solely operating a bricks & mortar strategy because today’s customer wants to access their favorite brands in an omnichannel way: browsing online to get a sense of trends, dropping into a store to check the fit and shopping via mobile for impulse or last minute buys. But how do retailers find balance within the omnichannel world?

    In our experience working with national and international retailers, getting the online and mobile experience right requires critical focus and serious investment in the three Ds: Distribution, Delivery and Data.

    Successful ecommerce platforms require well located (and well managed) distribution centers capable of handling the nearly 24-hour demand profile.

    Careful consideration needs to be given to whether an existing distribution

    Read More

    Congress Considers Legislative Solutions to Internet Sales Tax War

    October 6, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave and Charles Lin

    Congress Considers Legislative Solutions to Internet Sales Tax War

    October 6, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave and Charles Lin

    As we reported on September 15,  several states have enacted or proposed laws related to the collection of sales tax from online retailers without a physical presence in those states, as required by United States Supreme Court case Quill v. North Dakota.  South Dakota’s current lawsuit against several internet retailers was specifically brought by the state to force reconsideration of Supreme Court precedent.

    However, there is a small change that Congress may decide the issue before it reaches the Supreme Court, with three bills having been introduced and a fourth pending.

    One of the three bills, cited as the “No Regulation Without Representation Act of 2016“, is more or less a proposal to codify the decision in Quill.  Needless to say, the states who have challenged Quill are highly opposed to this bill.

    The other two bills, the “Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015” and the “Remote

    Read More

    How to Respond to Civil Subpoenas and Document Requests That Ask For Personal Information

    September 28, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave and David Zetoony

    How to Respond to Civil Subpoenas and Document Requests That Ask For Personal Information

    September 28, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave and David Zetoony

    Litigants in a civil dispute often use subpoenas, subpoenas duces tecum, and discovery requests to obtain personal information about individuals who may not be present in the litigation. A request for documents and information that include personal information about third parties may conflict with legal obligations imposed upon an organization not to produce information.

    For example, if an organization promises within its privacy policy that

    Read More

    Prop. 65 Conference Focuses on Compliance With New Warning and Settlement Regulations

    September 22, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Tom Lee

    Prop. 65 Conference Focuses on Compliance With New Warning and Settlement Regulations

    September 22, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Tom Lee

    The Prop. 65 Clearinghouse held its annual conference in San Francisco recently, and the speakers and panelists had a number of recommendations for both retailers and manufacturers following the adoption of Proposition 65’s new warning regulations.

    The New Warning Regulations

    As we reported on September 7th, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has adopted new warning regulations which take effect in two years on August 30, 2018.  Businesses can choose to comply with either the current or new regulations in the interim, but all retailers and manufacturers who sell products in California should review their Prop. 65 compliance protocols to ensure that they will continue to comply.

    The new regulations seek to put the primary responsibility for providing warnings on product manufacturers or suppliers, who must either label their products with any required warnings or provide notice and warning materials to retailers.

    The regulations expressly

    Read More

    States Battle E-Retailers and Federal Precedent Over Digital Sales Tax

    September 15, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave and Charles Lin

    States Battle E-Retailers and Federal Precedent Over Digital Sales Tax

    September 15, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave and Charles Lin

    South Dakota and several online retailers are currently engaged in a battle over the state’s new internet sales tax law (SB 106) aimed at online businesses who sell products to South Dakota residents but which are not obligated to pay sales tax to the state.

    Decades ago, during the internet’s infancy, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded in Quill v. N. Dakota that states are prohibited from requiring companies without a physical presence in those states to collect sales tax from its residents. Among the four internet retailers sued by South Dakota are the popular Overstock.com and Newegg.com.

    The state acknowledges in its complaint that SB 106 is a violation of Supreme Court precedent. However, it has stated that the purpose of the suit is to facilitate Supreme Court review, because Quill is outdated in the internet age.

    Several outcomes to the case are possible, including a grant

    Read More

    California Adopts New Prop. 65 Warning Regulations

    September 7, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Marcy Bergman

    California Adopts New Prop. 65 Warning Regulations

    September 7, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Marcy Bergman

    California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has adopted new Proposition 65 warning regulations.  The new regulations will take effect in two years, on August 30, 2018.  In the interim, businesses may choose to comply with either the current or new regulations.

    Prop. 65 prohibits businesses from knowingly and intentionally exposing California consumers to a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing a “clear and reasonable warning.”  As we reported on a draft of the regulations in April 2016, the new regulations substantially change what constitutes a clear and reasonable warning.

    Products with label warnings manufactured prior to the effective date of the new regulations would continue to receive protection from liability. Parties to existing settlement agreements or court-approved consent judgments also can continue to provide warnings that comply with those agreements or orders.

    Regulations Seek to

    Read More

    Online Seller Wins Dismissal of RICO Claims in Counterfeiting Action by Fashion Retailers

    August 25, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave, Patrick McKey, Maria Vathis and Nancy Franco

    Online Seller Wins Dismissal of RICO Claims in Counterfeiting Action by Fashion Retailers

    August 25, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave, Patrick McKey, Maria Vathis and Nancy Franco

    A New York federal court recently held that defendant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (“Alibaba”), which is notorious for allegedly enabling the sale of counterfeit products, did not violate federal racketeering law by selling allegedly counterfeit products on its e-commerce venues.

    Alibaba owns and operates the popular shopping sites Alibaba.com, Taobao.com, and AliExpress.com, and generated $248 billion in gross merchandise volume in 2014 – more than Amazon and eBay combined. Luxury fashion retailers, including Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent, filed suit against Alibabi and seven other corporate entities that had roles in online platforms through which Chinese merchants could connect with consumers worldwide.

    The lawsuit alleges that fourteen Chinese merchants, also named as defendants, sold counterfeit products bearing plaintiffs’ marks in the Alibaba marketplaces. It further alleges that the Alibaba defendants provided the online marketing, data collection, payment processing, financing, and shipping services necessary to sell the products, even though they

    Read More

    Receipt With Credit Card Data Constitutes Sufficient Injury for Class Action to Proceed

    August 22, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Marcy Bergman

    Receipt With Credit Card Data Constitutes Sufficient Injury for Class Action to Proceed

    August 22, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Marcy Bergman

    A recent federal court ruling allows a class action lawsuit to proceed against luxury fashion retailer Jimmy Choo for violating the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACTA).  This ruling, which will likely be appealed, has important implications for other consumer class action lawsuits against retailers.

    Jimmy Choo was accused of violating FACTA by printing credit card expiration dates on customer receipts in Wood v. J Choo USA, Inc., S.D. Fla. Case No. 15-cv-81487.  Jimmy Choo argued that the plaintiff had no standing to sue because she was not damaged when the retailer printed her credit card expiration date on her receipt. The court disagreed, holding that the consumer was sufficiently damaged to maintain the action as soon as soon as the receipt was printed.

    Companies facing lawsuits alleging FACTA violations should be aware that although the U.S. Supreme Court held in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins,

    Read More

    FDA Releases Final Rule Allowing Voluntary Risk Reviews of Food Additives to Continue

    August 17, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Brandon Neuschafer

    FDA Releases Final Rule Allowing Voluntary Risk Reviews of Food Additives to Continue

    August 17, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave, Merrit Jones and Brandon Neuschafer

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says its final rule allowing outside groups to evaluate food additive risks will streamline its “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS) reviews.

    The agency recently released its GRAS final rule for its food additive program, switching reviews from a more formal but slower “petition-based” process to a voluntary “notification” process.  For retailers with private label food products, that means that they or their vendors can continue to convene their own expert panels to review the safety of many food additives, and provide notice of their findings to the FDA.

    Under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), any substance that is intentionally added to food is a food additive that is subject to premarket review and approval by FDA, unless the substance is generally recognized, among qualified experts, as having been adequately shown to be safe under the conditions of its

    Read More

    New Federal Law Will Require Disclosure of GMO Content in Food

    August 11, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave, Brandon Neuschafer and Merrit Jones

    New Federal Law Will Require Disclosure of GMO Content in Food

    August 11, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave, Brandon Neuschafer and Merrit Jones

    A new federal law will require food makers to disclose when foods contain genetically modified ingredients.

    The law, which was recently signed by President Obama, will require such food products to be labeled with text, a symbol, or an electronic code readable by smartphone indicating the presence of GMOs. Small businesses will also have the option to label food products with a telephone number or Internet website directing customers to additional information.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has two years to draft regulations concerning which products require such disclosure, and additional details concerning what food makers must do to comply. After the regulations are finalized, food makers will have at least another year before the law takes effect.

    Law preempts state and local GMO labeling laws.

    The federal law preempts a similar Vermont law, Act 120, that took effect in July, as well as any other state or local

    Read More

    FAA Regulations Clear Way for Delivery Drones

    August 9, 2016

    Authors

    Bryan Cave and Flora Sarder

    FAA Regulations Clear Way for Delivery Drones

    August 9, 2016

    by: Bryan Cave and Flora Sarder

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has finalized its regulations concerning operational drones, allowing retailers to start using drone delivery systems.

    In making drones available for retail delivery use, the FAA has carved out a space for drones to operate without becoming an “air carrier” under federal law regulating air transportation.

    As a result, drones can now be used to deliver cargo in the mainland United States, except in Washington D.C., or any U.S. territory if the cargo weighs less than a total of 55 pounds, the flight is conducted from the remote pilot’s visual line of sight, the drones fly a maximum speed of 100 mph, and gain a maximum of 400 feet.

    The much anticipated drone regulations bode well for retailers and manufacturers making their way into the drone delivery space.  Just a couple of months ago, Switzerland’s postal service began testing out drone deliveries with Matternet, a company

    Read More

    New Colorado Laws Grant Employees Access to Personnel Files, Right to Pregnancy Accommodations

    July 26, 2016

    Authors

    Donald Samuels and Anthony George

    New Colorado Laws Grant Employees Access to Personnel Files, Right to Pregnancy Accommodations

    July 26, 2016

    by: Donald Samuels and Anthony George

    The Colorado General Assembly ended the 2016 session by passing significant employment legislation. In June 2016, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper signed into law House Bill 16-1432, granting employees access to personnel files upon request, and House Bill 16-1438 expanding protections for pregnant employees. All Colorado employers should familiarize themselves with these new laws and update related policies before they take effect.

    PERSONNEL FILES

    House Bill 16-1432 grants current and former employees the right to access their personnel files upon request. When the Act takes effect, likely on January 1, 2017, the provisions will be found at C.R.S. § 8-2-129.

    Summary

    This new law provides current and former employees access to their personnel files and allows current employees to obtain a copy of their personnel files.

    Defining “Personnel Files”

    The Act defines personnel files as “the personnel records of an employee, in the manner maintained by the employer and using reasonable efforts by the

    Read More
    « Previous PageNext Page »